Ruth – part 4 (3:1-18)

Previously, in Ruth…

Ruth’s mother-in-law, Naomi, had moved from the land of Israel to Moab, with her husband; but her husband soon died, and she was left with her two sons. While they were living in Moab, Naomi’s sons married Moabite women – Ruth and Orpah. But ten years later, her sons died, too. So Naomi and Ruth, her daughter-in-law, moved back to Naomi’s home town of Bethlehem, empty: no food, and no children.

But yesterday, in chapter 2, we saw how God graciously provided for them. Ruth went to glean grain in the field of Boaz, of one of Naomi’s relatives. There, she found incredible kindness – more than was required by the law. Boaz encouraged Ruth to remain under his protection by only gleaning in his fields; he even instructed his workers deliberately to leave behind some of the good parts of the grain for her to gather. And when it came to mealtimes, Boaz invited her to share in the meal with him and the other workers. Naomi spoted the potential, and encouraged Ruth to keep gleaning in Boaz’s field.

Continue reading

New Testament Commentary Series

A totally un-sponsored advertisement:

For the next few days, Olive Tree is offering a complete NT commentary series for US$40 (normally US$100) for iOS/Android.

Disclaimer: I don’t own it myself, but I do know the reputations of the scholars who have contributed to each volume, and I’ve flipped through some of the sample pages on Amazon for the hardcopy equivalents (e.g. Reading Matthew, David Garland).

It looks ideal for someone who wants more depth than a single-volume whole-bible commentary, but doesn’t want to pay $50-100 per bible book for the big scholarly tomes. The offer is until Dec 8.

http://www.olivetree.com/store/product.php?productid=17330

Ruth – part 3 (2:1-23)

At the end of Ruth chapter 1 (see yesterday), Naomi has returned to her homeland, poor and childless. She is bitter, because she sees God’s hand as being against her. She is “empty” – without a man in her family to provide food for her, and without an heir. Yet the chapter ended with a note of hope. Two notes, in fact. One of her daughters-in-law, Ruth, has stayed with her – more than that, has aligned herself with Israel and Israel’s God, despite being a Moabite. And it’s the start of the harvest in Israel. What will happen next?

Continue reading

Ruth – part 2 (1:6-22)

Yesterday we began a series on Ruth, and made a list of all the things that weren’t “right” in the first five verses. (You really need to read yesterday’s notes for today to make sense.) What did you come up with?

1:1 In the days when the judges ruled, there was a famine in the land. So a man from Bethlehem in Judah, together with his wife and two sons, went to live for a while in the country of Moab. 2 The man’s name was Elimelek, his wife’s name was Naomi, and the names of his two sons were Mahlon and Kilion. They were Ephrathites from Bethlehem, Judah. And they went to Moab and lived there. 3 Now Elimelek, Naomi’s husband, died, and she was left with her two sons. 4 They married Moabite women, one named Orpah and the other Ruth. After they had lived there about ten years, 5 both Mahlon and Kilion also died, and Naomi was left without her two sons and her husband. 

Right from the beginning, we see that it was in the days of the judges – which, as we learned from the very final verse of Judges, meant that there was no king and everyone did as they saw fit. Already off to a bad start.

Continue reading

Preaching the NT as Rhetoric

A quick commercial break:

My book on preaching has just been published by Wipf & Stock, and is available on Amazon for around $30. It’s the first in a new series of publications by the Australian College of Theology.

Update January 2015: It’s now available for $12 as an ebook.

Warning: this is a nerd book, arguing for the use of rhetorical critical methods in preaching the New Testament. I’m promoting it here mainly for those who are in the field of preacher training, or who have influence over the library purchases of theological colleges.

Over the next year I’m writing a more general guide for preachers and keen bible readers, minus the pretentious footnotes referencing Aristotle, and with a lot more practical examples. I’ll keep you posted on how that goes. (Two chapters written so far!)

An overview of what it’s about can be found here.

Ruth – part 1 (1:1-5)

Today, we begin a new series through the Old Testament book of Ruth. But we’re going to start a little bit before Ruth in our reading, in order to set the scene for what’s going on. (There’s a lot more bible-reading today, and less explanation than usual. You’ll see why later. Promise.)

First, let’s head back to a rather unsavoury incident in Abraham’s family tree:

Continue reading

The Parable of the Good Samaritan – Part 3

For the last two days we’ve walked through the parable of the Good Samaritan. (It would be best to read these first, for today’s to make any sense.) And we made it to the end of the story. Is there anything else left to be said?

But I think we’ve skipped over the final words of Jesus a little too quickly. Remember them?

10:37b “Go and do likewise.”

What might that actually look like? What would our lives be like if we intentionally set out to go and do likewise? What would our churches look like? Here are some of my thoughts…

Continue reading

The Parable of the Good Samaritan – Part 2

Yesterday, we started reading the parable of the Good Samaritan – if you’re just joining us, it will make more sense if you read that post first. But to summarise: the first two people who passed by didn’t help for three reasons: status (too important to stop), purity (too busy with ministry to be inconvenienced), and self-preservation (too scared of the danger to themselves). And we asked whether these are the same reasons we are reluctant to stop and help – and that we arrange our lives so that we avoid coming into contact with those who most need help.

Continue reading

The Parable of the Good Samaritan – Part 1

Yesterday we concluded our study of Philippians with guest writer, Marc Rader. Next week we begin a short series in the book of Ruth. For the remaining three days of this week, we look at the well-known parable of the Good Samaritan.

A common question asked by young Christian couples who are dating is ‘how far is too far?’ when it comes to physical contact. And of course, the standard holier-than-thou reply is, ‘well if you have to ask, then you’re going too far.’ It may not be the most immediately practical of answers, but it does make the couple think about their motivation for asking in the first place. Are they, in effect, saying ‘what can I get away with? What’s the minimum standard of holiness God requires?’

Continue reading

Philippians 4:10-23

Today we conclude a series by guest writer Marc Rader, in the book of Philippians. It’s written as a dialogue between Paul and Clement (an imaginary member of the Philippian church.)

Well, we’re at the end! I hope you’ve enjoyed this imaginative journey through Philippians. In this last section Paul thanks the Philippians for their financial partnership with him but in typical fashion takes the opportunity to teach on contentment.

Paul – There was, however, one last things to say. I’d kept it til last so that it was the final word – a word of thanks!

Continue reading